The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | near favourable | medium | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
African Skimmer Rynchops flavirostris | 100 | 135 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Savanna | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1952 | Murchison Falls | National Park | 100 |
1964 | Karuma | Wildlife Reserve | 1 |
1968 | Bugungu | Wildlife Reserve | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 37 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 20 | |
Savanna | 16 | |
Unknown | 10 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Riverine floodplains, Rivers & streams | 10 |
Shrubland | 4 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/murchison-falls-national-park-iba-uganda on 22/11/2024.