The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina | LC | breeding | 1996-2006 | 250-300 breeding pairs | A4i, B1i |
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | VU | breeding | 2004-2006 | 1,000 breeding pairs | B2 |
Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus | LC | breeding | 1996-2006 | 80-120 breeding pairs | B2 |
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni | NT | breeding | 1996-2006 | 10-11 breeding pairs | A1 |
Slender-billed Gull Larus genei | LC | passage | 2006 | 3,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | breeding | 1996-2006 | 150-250 breeding pairs | B2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | favourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Himantopus himantopus | 30 | 30 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni | 11 | 10 | breeding pairs | 91 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Marine Intertidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | 90 |
hunting | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mouth of Yeya river (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mouth-of-yeya-river-iba-russia-(european) on 23/11/2024.