The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Andaman Woodpigeon Columba palumboides | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Cuckoo-Dove Macropygia rufipennis | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Coucal Centropus andamanensis | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Crake Rallina canningi | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Boobook Ninox affinis | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Scops-owl Otus balli | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Serpent-eagle Spilornis elgini | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Woodpecker Dryocopus hodgei | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Drongo Dicrurus andamanensis | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Treepie Dendrocitta bayleii | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
White-headed Starling Sturnia erythropygia | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | low | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | Mount Harriett | National Park | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mount Harriet National Park (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mount-harriet-national-park-iba-india on 22/11/2024.