Data Zone
The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andaman Woodpigeon Columba palumboides | NT | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Cuckoo-Dove Macropygia rufipennis | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Coucal Centropus andamanensis | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Crake Rallina canningi | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Boobook Ninox affinis | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Scops-owl Otus balli | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Serpent-eagle Spilornis elgini | VU | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Woodpecker Dryocopus hodgei | VU | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Drongo Dicrurus andamanensis | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| Andaman Treepie Dendrocitta bayleii | VU | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
| White-headed Starling Sturnia erythropygia | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2003 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| yes | unset | good | |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | very high |
| Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Residential and commercial development | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
| Transportation and service corridors | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
| Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
| Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Forest | - | |
| Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
| Land use | % of IBA |
|---|---|
| nature conservation and research | - |
| tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mount Diavalo and Cuthbert Bay (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mount-diavalo-and-cuthbert-bay-iba-india on 22/12/2024.