The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiery Topaz Topaza pyra | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
White-eared Jacamar Galbalcyrhynchus leucotis | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Cerise-crowned Jacamar Galbula chalcocephala | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Brown Nunlet Nonnula brunnea | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
Black-headed Parrot Pionites melanocephalus | LC | unknown | 2003 | present | A3 |
Ancient Antwren Herpsilochmus gentryi | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A1, A3 |
White-masked Antbird Pithys castaneus | NT | resident | 1937 | present | A2, A3 |
Black-tailed Antbird Myrmoborus melanurus | NT | resident | 2003 | present | A1, A2 |
White-lored Antpitta Myrmothera fulviventris | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | not assessed | medium | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | White sand forest, Palm forest | major (>10) |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land | minor (<10) |
Other | minor (<10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | Riverine sand beaches | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Morona (Peru). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/morona-iba-peru on 22/11/2024.