The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red Knot Calidris canutus | NT | winter | 2001-2006 | 4,038 individuals | B1i, B2, C3 |
Common Redshank Tringa totanus | LC | passage | 2001-2006 | 2,323 individuals | B1i, C3 |
Common Redshank Tringa totanus | LC | winter | 2001-2006 | 1,727 individuals | B1i, C3 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | 2001-2006 | 24,011 individuals | A4iii, C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | very unfavourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | 105 | 46 | individuals | 44 | unfavourable |
Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus | 26,000 | 1,826 | individuals | 8 | very unfavourable |
Red Knot Calidris canutus | 3,120 | 4,038 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Common Redshank Tringa totanus | 2,320 | 2,323 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Common Redshank Tringa totanus | 2,450 | 1,727 | individuals | 71 | near favourable |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | 49,354 | 24,011 | individuals | 49 | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Montrose Basin (SWT) | Reserve | 96 |
1974 | Montrose Basin | Site of Special Scientific Interest (UK) | 97 |
1981 | Montrose Basin | Local Nature Reserve | 94 |
1985 | Dun's Dish | Site of Special Scientific Interest (UK) | 3 |
1995 | Montrose Basin | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
2003 | Montrose Basin | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2011 | Montrose Basin | Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) | 77 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | minor (<10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Fens, transition mires and springs | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
hunting | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Montrose Basin (United Kingdom). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/montrose-basin-iba-united-kingdom on 23/11/2024.