The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | favourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Ngermeskang | Nature Reserve | 6 |
- | Mesekelat | Conservation Area | 1 |
2000 | Ngardok | Nature Reserve | 4 |
2002 | Lake Ngardok Nature Reserve | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 4 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Lower montane rain forest (tropical), Lowland forest - mixed swamp | major (>10) |
Savanna | minor (<10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | Freshwater lakes and pools, Rivers & streams | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | major (>10) |
agriculture | minor (<10) |
nature conservation and research | minor (<10) |
water management | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Middle Ridge, Babeldaob (Palau). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/middle-ridge-babeldaob-iba-palau on 23/11/2024.