The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | passage | 2004-2009 | 650-700 individuals | C2 |
Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus | LC | passage | 2004-2009 | 550-600 individuals | C2 |
Bean Goose Anser fabalis | LC | passage | 2004-2009 | 10,000 individuals | C3 |
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | passage | 2004-2009 | 12,000 individuals | C3 |
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 2009 | 122 males | C1 |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | passage | 2004-2009 | 6,650 individuals | C2 |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | breeding | 2009 | 10 breeding pairs | C1 |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | passage | 2004-2009 | 60 individuals | C1 |
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa | NT | breeding | 2007-2009 | 11-16 breeding pairs | C1 |
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica | LC | breeding | 2009 | 250-280 breeding pairs | C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2004-2009 | 28,000-35,000 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | favourable | not assessed | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Common Crane Grus grus | 5,580 | 6,200 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1958 | Borek | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1975 | Łąki Ślesińskie | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1989 | Dolina Noteci | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 65 |
1991 | Nadnotecki | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 3 |
2001 | Dolina Noteci | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 91 |
2007 | Dolina Środkowej Noteci i Kanału Bydgoskiego | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 99 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 86 | |
Forest | 6 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 4 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 3 | |
Other | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Middle Notec River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/middle-notec-river-valley-iba-poland on 22/11/2024.