The site was identified as important in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lappet-faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotos | EN | non-breeding | - | present | A1 |
White-faced Barbet Pogonornis macclounii | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Anchieta's Barbet Stactolaema anchietae | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Rufous-bellied Tit Melaniparus rufiventris | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Red-capped Crombec Sylvietta ruficapilla | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Kurrichane Thrush Turdus libonyana | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Bannerman's Sunbird Cyanomitra bannermani | LC | - | - | present | A3 |
Grimwood's Longclaw Macronyx grimwoodi | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2005) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2005) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2005 | unfavourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Climate change and severe weather | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 20 | |
Forest | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mbulo Forest (Zambia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mbulo-forest-iba-zambia on 23/11/2024.