The site was identified as important in 2013 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | passage | 2012-2013 | 536 individuals | A1 |
Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus | LC | passage | 2012-2013 | 391 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2012-2013 | 22,023 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2013) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2013. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | not assessed | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Desert | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing brackish & salt water, Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation | 70 |
Shrubland | Low bushes | 20 |
Desert | Desert & semi-desert - sandy | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 100 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 30 |
rangeland/pastureland | 30 |
forestry | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mashankul and Khojakul lake complex (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mashankul-and-khojakul-lake-complex-iba-uzbekistan on 23/11/2024.