UZ052
Mashankul and Khojakul lake complex


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2013 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT passage 2012-2013 536 individuals A1
Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus LC passage 2012-2013 391 individuals A4i
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a passage 2012-2013 22,023 individuals A4iii

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2013) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2013. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2015 not assessed high negligible
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes unset good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Shrubland moderate (70-90%) moderate (70-90%) unfavourable
Desert moderate (70-90%) moderate (70-90%) unfavourable
Wetlands (inland) moderate (70-90%) good (> 90%) near favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather likely in long term (beyond 4 years) whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration high
Biological resource use happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Natural system modifications happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%) No management planning has taken place Very little or no conservation action taking place negligible

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Wetlands (inland) Standing brackish & salt water, Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation 70
Shrubland Low bushes 20
Desert Desert & semi-desert - sandy 10
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
hunting 100
fisheries/aquaculture 30
rangeland/pastureland 30
forestry 1

Land ownership
State grounds, the territory has tenants. There is no data on them.


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mashankul and Khojakul lake complex (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mashankul-and-khojakul-lake-complex-iba-uzbekistan on 23/11/2024.