The site was identified as important in 2016 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 11,550-20,000 individuals | A4i, B1i, C2 |
Smew Mergellus albellus | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 625-1,874 individuals | B1i, C2, C6 |
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | VU | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 28,645-55,107 individuals | A1, A4i, B1i, C1, C3 |
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | VU | winter | 2011-2015 | 4,065 individuals | B2 |
Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 50,400-82,018 individuals | A4i, B1i, C3 |
Gadwall Mareca strepera | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 1,535-2,838 individuals | B1i, C3 |
Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 35,083-45,584 individuals | A4i, B1i, C3 |
Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope | LC | winter | 2011-2015 | 27,540 individuals | B3 |
Eurasian Coot Fulica atra | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 41,391-64,751 individuals | B1i, C3 |
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 9,543-11,907 individuals | B1i, C3 |
Mediterranean Gull Larus melanocephalus | LC | breeding | 2011-2015 | 156 breeding pairs | B3, C6 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 534-1,488 individuals | C6 |
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus | LC | breeding | 2011-2015 | 1 breeding pairs | C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | non-breeding | 2011-2015 | 143,495-202,083 individuals | A4iii, C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2016) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2016. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | not assessed | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Very little or no conservation action taking place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Kogen | Nature Reserve | <1 |
- | De Drost, Hooft, Warenar | Nature Reserve | <1 |
- | Ijdoorn | Nature Reserve with Management Subsidy | <1 |
- | Uiterdijken | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1990 | Kustzone Muiden | Natural Monument | <1 |
2000 | Markermeer & IJmeer | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2000 | Markermeer | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 89 |
2000 | IJmeer | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 11 |
2002 | Markermeer & IJmeer | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 1 |
2010 | Markermeer & IJmeer | Natuurbeschermingswet | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
water management | 100 |
tourism/recreation | 100 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 90 |
urban/industrial/transport | 40 |
hunting | 5 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Markermeer & IJmeer (Netherlands). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/markermeer-&-ijmeer-iba-netherlands on 22/11/2024.