The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Altai Snowcock Tetraogallus altaicus | LC | breeding (2005) | 50-249 individuals | A3 |
Hazel Grouse Tetrastes bonasia | LC | breeding (2005) | 50-249 individuals | A3 |
Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula | LC | breeding (2006) | 70 individuals | A3 |
Goosander Mergus merganser | LC | breeding (2006) | 609 individuals | A4i |
Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope | LC | breeding (2006) | 5 individuals | A3 |
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus | VU | breeding (2006) | 2 individuals | A3 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage (2005) | 20,000-49,999 individuals | A4iii |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | very unfavourable | not assessed | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | poor |
State (condition of the key species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Goosander Mergus merganser | 10 / 609 (individuals) | 2 | very unfavourable | ||
Black Stork Ciconia nigra | 6 / 12 (individuals) | 50 | unfavourable | ||
Black Stork Ciconia nigra | 6 / 12 (individuals) | 50 | unfavourable | ||
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo | 150 / 45 (individuals) | 100 | favourable | ||
Osprey Pandion haliaetus | 1 / 1 (individuals) | 100 | favourable | ||
Milvus migrans | 300 / 1 (individuals) | 100 | favourable |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1976 | Markakol'skiy | State Nature Reserve (Ia) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 55 | Fens, transition mires & springs; Rivers & streams; Standing fresh water |
Grassland | 20 | Alpine, subalpine & boreal; Humid; Mesophile grassland & tall grass steppe; Tundra |
Forest | 15 | Flood-plain; Mixed; Native coniferous; Treeline ecotone |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 5 | Inland cliffs; Scree, boulders & bare rocky areas |
Shrubland | 5 | Low bushes; Scrub |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) | Other urban & industrial areas; Ruderal land |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 95 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 30 |
rangeland/pastureland | 10 |
agriculture | 5 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Markakol State Nature Reserve (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/markakol-state-nature-reserve-iba-kazakhstan on 19/01/2025.