KE017
Marenji Forest


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Fischer's Turaco Tauraco fischeri NT resident (1999) present A1, A2, A3
Eastern Green Tinkerbird Pogoniulus simplex LC resident (1999) present A3
Mombasa Woodpecker Campethera mombassica LC resident (1999) present A3
Brown-headed Parrot Poicephalus cryptoxanthus LC resident (1999) present A3
Green-headed Oriole Oriolus chlorocephalus LC resident (1999) present A3
Chestnut-fronted Helmetshrike Prionops scopifrons LC resident (1999) present A3
Fischer's Greenbul Phyllastrephus fischeri LC resident (1999) present A3
Lowland Tiny Greenbul Phyllastrephus debilis LC resident (1999) present A3
Little Yellow Flycatcher Erythrocercus holochlorus LC resident (1999) present A3
Black-bellied Starling Notopholia corusca LC resident (1999) present A3
Plain-backed Sunbird Anthreptes reichenowi NT resident (1999) present A1, A3
Sokoke Pipit Anthus sokokensis EN resident (1999) present A1, A2, A3

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2023 poor high medium
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Shrubland moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor
Forest good (>90%) good (>90%) good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Residential and commercial development happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Natural system modifications happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Biological resource use happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not compre­hensive Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity medium

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Forest - Lowland forest - undifferentiated
Shrubland - Scrub - woodland

Land use

Land use % of IBA
forestry -
nature conservation and research -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Marenji Forest (Kenya). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/marenji-forest-iba-kenya on 23/12/2024.