The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian Snowcock Tetraogallus caucasicus | LC | resident | 2006 | present | A2, A3 |
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident | 2006 | 600-800 breeding pairs | A1, A2, A3 |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident | 2006-2007 | 15-25 breeding pairs | A1, B2 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | breeding | 2006-2007 | 7-10 breeding pairs | A1 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | breeding | 2007 | 1 breeding pairs | B2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | favourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | 1 | 0 | breeding pairs | 0 | not assessed |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | 15 | 15 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | 7 | 7 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1972 | Verhne-Malkinskiy | Zakaznik | 48 |
1975 | Nizhne-Malkinskiy | Zakaznik | 52 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 40 | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 30 | |
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland, Steppes and dry calcareous grassland | 28 |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | 2 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 90 |
forestry | 40 |
not utilised | 40 |
rangeland/pastureland | 10 |
nature conservation and research | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Malka river ravine (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/malka-river-ravine-iba-russia-(european) on 23/11/2024.