The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bean Goose Anser fabalis | LC | passage | 2008-2009 | 15,000-18,000 individuals | C3 |
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | passage | 2008-2009 | 10,000-12,000 individuals | C3 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2001-2009 | 35,000 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | not assessed | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | Dolina Małej Wełny pod Kiszkowem | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 78 |
2008 | Stawy Kiszkowskie | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 31 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 45 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 43 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 11 | |
Other | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mala Welna River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mala-welna-river-valley-iba-poland on 22/11/2024.