The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blue Crane Anthropoides paradiseus | VU | resident | - | present | A1 |
Black Stork Ciconia nigra | LC | non-breeding | - | 10-20 individuals | A4i |
Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres | VU | resident | - | 100-250 breeding pairs | A1, A4ii |
Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres | VU | non-breeding | - | 250-600 individuals | A1, A4ii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | very unfavourable | very high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Blue Crane Anthropoides paradiseus | 10 | 2 | adults | 20 | very unfavourable |
Black Stork Ciconia nigra | 4 | 1 | breeding pairs | 25 | very unfavourable |
Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres | 400 | 332 | breeding pairs | 83 | near favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1949 | Wonderboom Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1957 | Saronde Private Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1959 | M'Nandi Private Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1960 | Diepsloot Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1960 | Flintbeck Private Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1961 | Elangeni Private Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1967 | Kgaswane Mountain Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | 1 |
1968 | Arabos Private Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1969 | Hartbeespoort Dam Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | 1 |
1994 | Magaliesberg Protected Natural Environment | Protected Environment | 9 |
2015 | Magaliesberg Biosphere Reserve | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 97 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
BirdLife South Africa | 0 |
Buffelspoort conservancy | 0 |
Hekpoort conservancy | 0 |
Magalisberg Biosphere Conservancy | 0 |
Magalisberg protection association | 2007 |
Rhino and Lion reserve | 0 |
Vulture valley conservancy | 0 |
WESSA | 0 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Urban parks and gardens, Other urban and industrial areas, Arable land | major (>10) |
Grassland | Grassland - montane | major (>10) |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree, boulders & bare rock | major (>10) |
Savanna | Wooded grassland | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
water management | 20 |
nature conservation and research | 6 |
tourism/recreation | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
agriculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Magaliesberg (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/magaliesberg-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.