The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 2006-2009 | 98-120 males | C1 |
Eurasian Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria | LC | passage | 2005-2008 | 6,000-8,000 individuals | C2 |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | passage | 2005-2008 | 750-1,100 individuals | C1 |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | breeding | 2004-2008 | 102-119 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | breeding | 1998 | 60 breeding pairs | C6 |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | LC | breeding | 2004-2008 | 255-353 breeding pairs | C6 |
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla | LC | breeding | 2007-2008 | 15-19 breeding pairs | C6 |
Barred Warbler Curruca nisoria | LC | breeding | 1998-2000 | 360 breeding pairs | C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2004-2009 | 20,000 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Zespo/l/ Nadwis/lan/skich Parko/w Krajobrazowych | Landscape Park | 27 |
1953 | Wielka Kępa | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1953 | Wielka Ke/pa [Forest Reserve] | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1956 | Ostrów Panieński | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1956 | Linie NR (Peatbog Reserve) | Nature Reserve | - |
1958 | Las Mariański | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1965 | Wiosło Małe | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1968 | Las Mątawski | Rezerwat Przyrody | 1 |
1972 | Wiosło Duże | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1983 | Niziny Ciechocińskiej | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 12 |
1985 | Środkowożuławski | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 7 |
1985 | Doliny Kwidzyńskiej | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 5 |
1985 | Białej Góry | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 3 |
1987 | Kępa Bazarowa | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1993 | Nadwiślański Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy | 18 |
1993 | Zespó Nadwiolañskich Parków Krajobrazowych | Landscape Park | - |
1994 | Żuław Gdańskich | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 6 |
1994 | Nadwiślański (woj. pomorskie) | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 3 |
1994 | Gniewski | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | <1 |
1998 | Chełmiński Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy | 7 |
2001 | Dolna Wisła | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 19 |
2002 | Nieszawska Dolina Wisły | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 8 |
2002 | Włocławska Dolina Wisły | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 8 |
2002 | Solecka Dolina Wisły | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 16 |
2002 | Dybowska Dolina Wisły | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 3 |
2004 | Cytadela Grudziądz | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | <1 |
2007 | Dolina Dolnej Wisły | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 79 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Other urban and industrial areas | 38 |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation, Fens, transition mires and springs | 31 |
Grassland | Humid grasslands, Mesophile grasslands | 21 |
Forest | Alluvial and very wet forest | 8 |
Other | 2 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | 25 |
agriculture | 20 |
urban/industrial/transport | 20 |
not utilised | 15 |
unknown | 15 |
tourism/recreation | 5 |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lower Vistula River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lower-vistula-river-valley-iba-poland on 22/11/2024.