The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Common Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus | LC | breeding (2007–2009) | 30 pairs | C6 |
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax | LC | breeding (2007–2009) | 280 pairs | C6 |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | breeding (2007–2009) | 400–524 pairs | C6 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | not assessed | very high | very low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (<4 years) | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Energy production and mining | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Some of area covered (10–49%) | Not assessed | Very little or no conservation action taking place | very low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1959 | Żaki | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | <1 |
1996 | Przeciszów | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | 1 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 49 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 22 | |
Grassland | 17 | |
Forest | 6 | |
Other | 6 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lower Skawa River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lower-skawa-river-valley-iba-poland on 24/12/2024.