The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 1995-2002 | 50-80 males | C1 |
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana | LC | breeding | 1995-2003 | 30-50 males | C6 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | breeding | 1995-2002 | 60-100 breeding pairs | C6 |
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica | LC | breeding | 2004-2009 | 25-28 breeding pairs | C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2004-2009 | 20,000 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | unfavourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1998 | Santockie Zakole | Rezerwat Przyrody | 2 |
2002 | Ujście Noteci | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 15 |
2003 | Dolina Warty i Dolnej Noteci | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 90 |
2007 | Dolina Dolnej Noteci | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 58 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 30 | |
Forest | 7 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 4 | |
Other | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lower Notec River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lower-notec-river-valley-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.