The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Violet Turaco Musophaga violacea | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Red-throated Bee-eater Merops bulocki | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Rosy Bee-eater Merops malimbicus | LC | breeding | 1996 | 15,000 breeding pairs | A4ii |
Blue-bellied Roller Coracias cyanogaster | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Bearded Barbet Pogonornis dubius | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Senegal Parrot Poicephalus senegalus | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Piapiac Ptilostomus afer | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Oriole Warbler Hypergerus atriceps | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Purple Starling Lamprotornis purpureus | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Black-rumped Waxbill Estrilda troglodytes | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
Sahel Bush-sparrow Gymnoris dentata | LC | resident | 1999 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Rosy Bee-eater Merops malimbicus | 500 | 0 | adults | 0 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Pategi | Forest Reserve | 2 |
2008 | Lower Kaduna-Middle Niger Floodplain | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 81 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | 58 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 17 | |
Forest | 15 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 7 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lower Kaduna - Middle Niger flood-plain (Nigeria). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lower-kaduna--middle-niger-flood-plain-iba-nigeria on 22/11/2024.