The site was identified as important in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 1992-1999 | 270-290 breeding pairs | C6 |
Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus | NT | breeding | 1989-1996 | 360-470 breeding pairs | B2 |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | breeding | 2002-2011 | 9-12 breeding pairs | A1, C1 |
Eurasian Scops-owl Otus scops | LC | breeding | 2000-2010 | 40-65 breeding pairs | B2 |
Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus | LC | winter | 2000-2010 | 30-50 individuals | C6 |
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus | VU | passage | 2000-2010 | 100-200 individuals | A1, C1, C6 |
Barred Warbler Curruca nisoria | LC | breeding | 2004-2010 | 110-160 breeding pairs | B3, C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2011) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | very unfavourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Corncrake Crex crex | 280 | 126 | males | 45 | unfavourable |
Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus | 415 | 105 | breeding pairs | 26 | very unfavourable |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | 12 | 6 | breeding pairs | 50 | unfavourable |
Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola | 110 | 7 | breeding pairs | 7 | very unfavourable |
Whinchat Saxicola rubetra | 2,100 | 300 | breeding pairs | 15 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Forest | poor (40-69%) | good (> 90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Ia_i morost | Nature Reserve | - |
1951 | Koslerjev gozd (Koslerjeva gošča) | naravni rezervat | <1 |
1959 | Koslerjeva gosèa | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1986 | Draga pri Igu | Natural Monument | <1 |
1988 | Jezero pri Podpeči | naravni spomenik | <1 |
1991 | Podpeški kamnolom | naravni spomenik | <1 |
1995 | Mali plac | naravni rezervat | <1 |
2004 | Ljubljansko barje | ekološko pomembno območje | 92 |
2004 | Ljubljansko barje | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 90 |
2004 | Ljubljansko barje | posebno varstveno območje | 89 |
2004 | Ljubljansko barje | posebno varstveno območje | 85 |
2004 | Ljubljansko Barje | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 99 |
2004 | Osrednje območje življenjskega prostora velikih zveri | ekološko pomembno območje | 5 |
2008 | Krajinski park Ljubljansko barje | krajinski park | 89 |
2008 | Ljubljanica | naravni spomenik | 1 |
2008 | Iški morost | naravni rezervat | <1 |
2008 | Goriški mah | naravni rezervat | <1 |
2008 | Ribniki v dolini Drage pri Igu | naravni rezervat | <1 |
2008 | Strajanov breg | naravni rezervat | <1 |
2008 | Jurčevo šotišče | naravni spomenik | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Other urban and industrial areas | 40 |
Grassland | Humid grasslands | 30 |
Forest | Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest | 10 |
Shrubland | Scrub | 10 |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams, Raised bogs | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 70 |
forestry | 10 |
nature conservation and research | 5 |
tourism/recreation | 5 |
urban/industrial/transport | 5 |
unknown | 5 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ljubljansko moor (Slovenia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ljubljansko-moor-iba-slovenia on 23/11/2024.