The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brown-headed Parrot Poicephalus cryptoxanthus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Plain-backed Sunbird Anthreptes reichenowi | NT | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Lemon-breasted Canary Crithagra citrinipectus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2002 | Maose-Xini | Wildlife Management Area | 54 |
2002 | Sengwe | Wildlife Management Area | 40 |
2002 | Chipise | Wildlife Management Area | 4 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 96 | |
Shrubland | 3 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Limpopo - Mwenezi flood-plain and pans (Zimbabwe). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/limpopo--mwenezi-flood-plain-and-pans-iba-zimbabwe on 23/11/2024.