The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Musk Duck Biziura lobata | LC | non-breeding | 1981-2008 | 2,000 individuals | A4i |
Banded Stilt Cladorhynchus leucocephalus | LC | non-breeding | 1981-2008 | 10,000 individuals | A4i |
Hooded Plover Thinornis cucullatus | VU | non-breeding | 1995-1999 | 43-606 adults | A1, A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1914 | Woody Lake | Nature Reserve | 8 |
1953 | Mullet Lake | Nature Reserve | 14 |
1973 | Lake Warden | Nature Reserve | 15 |
1973 | Unnamed WA32259 | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1990 | Lake Warden System | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 36 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
rangeland/pastureland | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Warden System (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-warden-system-iba-australia on 23/11/2024.