KE028
Lake Turkana This is an IBA in Danger! 


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus LC non-breeding (1992) 2,580 birds A4i
Pink-backed Pelican Pelecanus rufescens LC non-breeding (1992) 1,060 birds A4i
Common Ringed Plover Charadrius hiaticula LC winter (1992) 13,600 birds A4i
Kittlitz's Plover Charadrius pecuarius LC non-breeding (1992) 8,600 birds A4i
Caspian Plover Charadrius asiaticus LC winter (1992) 500 birds A4i
Spur-winged Lapwing Vanellus spinosus LC non-breeding (1992) 6,930 birds A4i
Little Stint Calidris minuta LC winter (1992) 113,000 birds A4i
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a non-breeding (1992) 100,000-499,999 birds A4iii

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2023 poor very high very low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Wetlands (inland) moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Pollution likely in short term (<4 years) whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Biological resource use happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Natural system modifications likely in short term (<4 years) most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Transportation and service corridors likely in long term (>4 years) whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Energy production and mining likely in long term (>4 years) most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Residential and commercial development likely in long term (>4 years) some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Little/none of area covered (<10%) No management planning has taken place Some limited conservation initiatives are in place very low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1973 Sibiloi National Park (II) 1
1983 South Island National Park (II) 1
1983 Central Island National Park (II) <1
1997 Lake Turkana National Parks World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) (UA) 21

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Wetlands (inland) 100 Saline lakes

Land use

Land use % of IBA
fisheries/aquaculture -
nature conservation and research -
tourism/recreation -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Turkana (Kenya). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-turkana-iba-kenya on 22/12/2024.