The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Lesser Flamingo Phoeniconaias minor | 2,500,000 | 285 | individuals | 1 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Lake Natron GCA | Game controlled area | 91 |
- | Mto wa Mbu GCA | Game controlled area | 3 |
- | Burko O.A. | Open area | 2 |
2001 | Lake Natron Basin | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
ILKISONGO PASTORAL INITIATIVES (IPI) | 1999 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 56 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 39 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 4 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Natron and Engaruka basin (Tanzania). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-natron-and-engaruka-basin-iba-tanzania on 22/11/2024.