The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | EN | passage | 2005 | 2,500 individuals | A1, A4i, B1i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | 3,850 | 3,850 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis | 8,000 | 7,000 | individuals | 88 | near favourable |
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea | 30,000 | 30,000 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | 525 | 520 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1990 | Chernye Zemli | Zapovednik | 33 |
1993 | Chernyje Zemli | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 36 |
1994 | Lake Manych-Gudilo | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
1996 | Manychskiy | Zakaznik | 15 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing brackish and salt water | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 60 |
hunting | 40 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Manych-Gudilo (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-manych-gudilo-iba-russia-(european) on 27/11/2024.