AZ045
Lake Mahmudchala


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris NT breeding 1997-2004 5-10 breeding pairs A1
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina LC winter 1997-2004 300-1,295 individuals A4i, B1i
Common Pochard Aythya ferina VU winter 1997-2004 100-9,390 individuals B1i, B3
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT breeding 1997-2004 24-640 breeding pairs A1, A4i, B1i, B2
Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata LC winter 1997-2004 5,674-7,777 individuals B1i
Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope LC winter 1997-2004 600-19,350 individuals B1i
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia LC breeding 1997-2004 2-200 breeding pairs B1i, B2
Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus LC breeding 1990-2004 250-6,000 breeding pairs A4i, B1i
Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides LC breeding 1997-2004 250-1,000 breeding pairs B1i, B2
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis LC breeding 1990-2004 850-1,500 breeding pairs A4i, B1i
Purple Heron Ardea purpurea LC breeding 1997-2004 54-100 breeding pairs B2
Little Egret Egretta garzetta LC breeding 1997-2004 825-3,000 breeding pairs A4i, B1i
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus LC breeding 1997-2004 125-800 breeding pairs A1, A4i, B1i, B2
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC breeding 1997-2004 604-2,500 breeding pairs A4i, B1i
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a breeding 1996 12,000-15,000 breeding pairs A4iii
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a winter 1996 10,000-40,000 individuals A4iii

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2005) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2008 near favourable low low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Wetlands (inland) good (> 90%) moderate (70-90%) near favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Some of site covered (10-49%) No management planning has taken place Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity low

Local Conservation Groups

The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.

Name Year formed
info avialable at AOS 2005
For more information on BirdLife's work with Local Conservation Groups, please click here.

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Wetlands (inland) Salt marshes, Standing brackish and salt water, Water fringe vegetation 80
Artificial/Terrestrial Arable land -
Desert Semidesert -
Shrubland Scrub -
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
hunting major (>10)
fisheries/aquaculture major (>10)
agriculture minor (<10)
rangeland/pastureland minor (<10)


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Mahmudchala (Azerbaijan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-mahmudchala-iba-azerbaijan on 24/11/2024.