AZ045
Lake Mahmudchala


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris NT breeding (1997–2004) 5–10 pairs A1
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina LC winter (1997–2004) 300–1,295 birds A4i, B1i
Common Pochard Aythya ferina VU winter (1997–2004) 100–9,390 birds B1i, B3
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT breeding (1997–2004) 24–640 pairs A1, A4i, B1i, B2
Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata LC winter (1997–2004) 5,674–7,777 birds B1i
Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope LC winter (1997–2004) 600–19,350 birds B1i
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia LC breeding (1997–2004) 2–200 pairs B1i, B2
Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus LC breeding (1990–2004) 250–6,000 pairs A4i, B1i
Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides LC breeding (1997–2004) 250–1,000 pairs B1i, B2
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis LC breeding (1990–2004) 850–1,500 pairs A4i, B1i
Purple Heron Ardea purpurea LC breeding (1997–2004) 54–100 pairs B2
Little Egret Egretta garzetta LC breeding (1997–2004) 825–3,000 pairs A4i, B1i
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus LC breeding (1997–2004) 125–800 pairs A1, A4i, B1i, B2
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC breeding (1997–2004) 604–2,500 pairs A4i, B1i
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a breeding (1996) 12,000–15,000 pairs A4iii
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a winter (1996) 10,000–40,000 birds A4iii

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2008 moderate low low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Wetlands (inland) good (>90%) moderate (70–90%) moderate

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Some of area covered (10–49%) No management planning has taken place Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity low

Local Conservation Groups

The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.

Name Year formed
info avialable at AOS 2005
For more information on BirdLife's work with Local Conservation Groups, please visit Spotlight on local empowerment.

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Wetlands (inland) 80 Salt marshes; Standing brackish and salt water; Water fringe vegetation
Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable land
Desert - Semidesert
Shrubland - Scrub

Land use

Land use % of IBA
hunting major (>10)
fisheries/aquaculture major (>10)
agriculture minor (<10)
rangeland/pastureland minor (<10)


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Mahmudchala (Azerbaijan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-mahmudchala-iba-azerbaijan on 27/12/2024.