The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus | LC | winter | 2003 | present | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | 2003 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | near favourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1968 | Kita okhotsk | 都道府県立自然公園 | 93 |
1983 | Hamatonbetsu-Kutcharoko | 国指定鳥獣保護区 | 100 |
1989 | Kutcharo-ko | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 57 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Kuccharo (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-kuccharo-iba-japan on 24/11/2024.