The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chilean Pigeon Patagioenas araucana | LC | resident (2008) | present | A2 |
Slender-billed Parakeet Enicognathus leptorhynchus | LC | resident (2008) | present | A2 |
Black-throated Huet-huet Pteroptochos tarnii | LC | resident (2008) | present | A2 |
Chucao Tapaculo Scelorchilus rubecula | LC | resident (2008) | present | A2 |
Ochre-flanked Tapaculo Eugralla paradoxa | LC | resident (2008) | present | A2 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2021) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2021 | very poor | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | poor (40–69%) | very poor (<40%) | very poor |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lago Budi (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lago-budi-iba-chile on 23/12/2024.