The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black-necked Grebe Podiceps nigricollis | LC | winter | - | 500-3,000 individuals | A4i |
Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus | LC | breeding | - | 1,000-5,000 breeding pairs | A4i |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | winter | - | 80-220 individuals | A4i |
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo | LC | winter | - | 2,000-6,000 individuals | A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2009 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | 20,000 | 3,186 | individuals | 16 | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1993 | Îles Chîkly | Nature Reserve | <1 |
2013 | Complexe lac de Tunis | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 92 |
2013 | Complexe lac de Tunis | Wetland Zone of National Importance | 92 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
AAO/ Tunisian Ornithology Group (GTO) | 2000 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | Saltpans | major (>10) |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lac de Tunis (Tunisia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lac-de-tunis-iba-tunisia on 23/11/2024.