The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | passage | 1997 | 400 individuals | B1i, C2 |
Goosander Mergus merganser | LC | passage | 1997 | 3,000 individuals | A4i, B1i, C3 |
Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena | LC | breeding | 1997 | 101 breeding pairs | B1i, C3 |
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla | LC | winter | 1997 | 10-15 individuals | A1, C1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena | 100 | 65 | breeding pairs | 65 | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1965 | IISSALON JA EMÄKARIN LUONNONSUOJELUALUE | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
1995 | Harolanlahti | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 12 |
1995 | Köyliönjärvi | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 10 |
1997 | Pyhäjärvi | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 24 |
1998 | Pyhäjärvi | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 24 |
1998 | Harolanlahti | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 12 |
1998 | Köyliönjärvi | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 10 |
2001 | Kirkkosaaren ja Kaukosaaren luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 1 |
2003 | Köyliönjärven luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 7 |
2009 | Luvanlahti-Harolanlahti, Lohiluoma | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
2011 | Tapolan luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 4 |
2012 | Mäkitalon luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
2012 | Lähderinteen luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater | 80 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Mixed woodland | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 90 |
water management | 80 |
forestry | 10 |
military | 5 |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Köyliönjärvi and Pyhäjärvi lakes (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/köyliönjärvi-and-pyhäjärvi-lakes-iba-finland on 23/11/2024.