FI002
Käsivarsi fjelds


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus VU breeding 1996 1 breeding pairs A3
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis VU breeding 1996 100 breeding pairs A3
Common Scoter Melanitta nigra LC breeding 1996 50 breeding pairs A3
Smew Mergellus albellus LC breeding 1996 5-20 breeding pairs B2, C2
Greater Scaup Aythya marila LC breeding 1996 30-50 breeding pairs A3
Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata LC breeding 1996 10-50 breeding pairs B2, C2, C6
Eurasian Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria LC breeding 1996 300-1,000 breeding pairs B3, C6
Eurasian Dotterel Eudromias morinellus LC breeding 1996 100-300 breeding pairs C2
Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica NT breeding 1996 1-5 breeding pairs A3
Temminck's Stint Calidris temminckii LC breeding 1996 50-100 breeding pairs A3
Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima LC breeding 1996 10 breeding pairs A3
Red-necked Phalarope Phalaropus lobatus LC breeding 1996 200-500 breeding pairs A3, C2
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus LC breeding 1996 5-10 breeding pairs A3
Common Redshank Tringa totanus LC breeding 1996 50-200 breeding pairs B2
Long-tailed Jaeger Stercorarius longicaudus LC breeding 1996 20-200 breeding pairs A3
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus LC breeding 1996 50-200 breeding pairs B2, C2, C6
Snowy Owl Bubo scandiacus VU breeding 1996 10 breeding pairs A3, B2, C6
Gyrfalcon Falco rusticolus LC resident 1996 present A3
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica LC breeding 1996 20,000 breeding pairs C2
Red-throated Pipit Anthus cervinus LC breeding 1996 50-100 breeding pairs A3
Meadow Pipit Anthus pratensis LC breeding 1996 30,000 breeding pairs B3
Lapland Longspur Calcarius lapponicus LC breeding 1996 500-2,000 breeding pairs A3
Snow Bunting Plectrophenax nivalis LC breeding 1996 3,000-8,000 breeding pairs A3

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 very unfavourable high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Reference Actual Units % remaining Result
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus 40 0 breeding pairs 0 very unfavourable
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis 250 250 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Greater Scaup Aythya marila 120 120 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Eurasian Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria 7,500 7,800 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Eurasian Dotterel Eudromias morinellus 1,400 1,400 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica 45 45 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Temminck's Stint Calidris temminckii 800 800 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus 200 200 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Long-tailed Jaeger Stercorarius longicaudus 1,100 1,100 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Snowy Owl Bubo scandiacus 10 0 breeding pairs 0 very unfavourable
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica 15,000 4,500 breeding pairs 30 very unfavourable
Meadow Pipit Anthus pratensis 30,000 27,000 breeding pairs 90 near favourable
Lapland Longspur Calcarius lapponicus 20,000 30,000 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Snow Bunting Plectrophenax nivalis 1,700 1,700 breeding pairs 100 favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happening now whole area/population (>90%) slow but significant deterioration high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happening now whole area/population (>90%) slow but significant deterioration high

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive Some limited conservation initiatives are in place low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
1988 Annjalonin luonnonsuojelualue Valtion luonnonsuojelualue <1
1991 Käsivarren erämaa Erämaa-alue 79
1996 Käsivarren Erämaa Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 89
1998 Käsivarren Erämaa Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 88
2000 Tornionjoen-Muonionjoen vesistöalue Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 11

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Grassland Tundra 70
Unknown 15
Wetlands (inland) Raised bogs 15
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
tourism/recreation -
other -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Käsivarsi fjelds (Finland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/käsivarsi-fjelds-iba-finland on 23/11/2024.