FI002
Käsivarsi fjelds


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus VU breeding (1996) 1 pairs A3
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis VU breeding (1996) 100 pairs A3
Common Scoter Melanitta nigra LC breeding (1996) 50 pairs A3
Smew Mergellus albellus LC breeding (1996) 5–20 pairs B2, C2
Greater Scaup Aythya marila LC breeding (1996) 30–50 pairs A3
Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata LC breeding (1996) 10–50 pairs B2, C2, C6
Eurasian Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria LC breeding (1996) 300–1,000 pairs B3, C6
Eurasian Dotterel Eudromias morinellus LC breeding (1996) 100–300 pairs C2
Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica NT breeding (1996) 1–5 pairs A3
Temminck's Stint Calidris temminckii LC breeding (1996) 50–100 pairs A3
Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima LC breeding (1996) 10 pairs A3
Red-necked Phalarope Phalaropus lobatus LC breeding (1996) 200–500 pairs A3, C2
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus LC breeding (1996) 5–10 pairs A3
Common Redshank Tringa totanus LC breeding (1996) 50–200 pairs B2
Long-tailed Jaeger Stercorarius longicaudus LC breeding (1996) 20–200 pairs A3
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus LC breeding (1996) 50–200 pairs B2, C2, C6
Snowy Owl Bubo scandiacus VU breeding (1996) 10 pairs A3, B2, C6
Gyrfalcon Falco rusticolus LC resident (1996) present A3
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica LC breeding (1996) 20,000 pairs C2
Red-throated Pipit Anthus cervinus LC breeding (1996) 50–100 pairs A3
Meadow Pipit Anthus pratensis LC breeding (1996) 30,000 pairs B3
Lapland Longspur Calcarius lapponicus LC breeding (1996) 500–2,000 pairs A3
Snow Bunting Plectrophenax nivalis LC breeding (1996) 3,000–8,000 pairs A3

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 very poor high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus 0 / 40 (pairs) 0 very poor
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis 250 / 250 (pairs) 100 good
Greater Scaup Aythya marila 120 / 120 (pairs) 100 good
Eurasian Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria 7,800 / 7,500 (pairs) 100 good
Eurasian Dotterel Eudromias morinellus 1,400 / 1,400 (pairs) 100 good
Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica 45 / 45 (pairs) 100 good
Temminck's Stint Calidris temminckii 800 / 800 (pairs) 100 good
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus 200 / 200 (pairs) 100 good
Long-tailed Jaeger Stercorarius longicaudus 1,100 / 1,100 (pairs) 100 good
Snowy Owl Bubo scandiacus 0 / 10 (pairs) 0 very poor
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica 4,500 / 15,000 (pairs) 30 very poor
Meadow Pipit Anthus pratensis 27,000 / 30,000 (pairs) 90 moderate
Lapland Longspur Calcarius lapponicus 30,000 / 20,000 (pairs) 100 good
Snow Bunting Plectrophenax nivalis 1,700 / 1,700 (pairs) 100 good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not compre­hensive Some limited conservation initiatives are in place low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1988 Annjalonin luonnonsuojelualue Valtion luonnonsuojelualue (Ia) <1
1991 Käsivarren erämaa Erämaa-alue (Ib) 79

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Grassland 70 Tundra
Unknown 15
Wetlands (inland) 15 Raised bogs

Land use

Land use % of IBA
tourism/recreation -
other -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Käsivarsi fjelds (Finland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/käsivarsi-fjelds-iba-finland on 23/12/2024.