KZ004
Kushum Lakes


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala EN passage (2007) 350 birds A1, A4i
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus LC passage (2007) 872 birds A4i
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina LC passage (2007) 3,530 birds A4i
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a passage (2007) 20,000-49,999 birds A4iii

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 very poor not assessed not assessed
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat poor

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala 48 / 1 (birds) 100 good
Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna 500 / 800 (birds) 63 poor
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa 117 / 60 (birds) 100 good
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni 16 / 60 (birds) 27 very poor

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Artificial/Terrestrial moderate (70–90%) poor (40–69%) very poor
Wetlands (inland) moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor
Desert good (>90%) good (>90%) good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Natural system modifications happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Biological resource use happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Pollution happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Transportation and service corridors happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Not assessed Not assessed Not assessed not assessed

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1967 Jalturkulskiy Zakaznik (IV) 11

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Desert 60 Desert & semi-desert - clay; Desert & semi-desert - salty; Desert & semi-desert - sandy
Wetlands (inland) 35 Standing brackish & salt water; Standing fresh water; Water-fringe vegetation
Artificial/Terrestrial 5 Other urban & industrial areas; Ruderal land

Land use

Land use % of IBA
rangeland/pastureland 50
hunting 30
fisheries/aquaculture 20


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kushum Lakes (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kushum-lakes-iba-kazakhstan on 23/12/2024.