RU1389
Kurnikov liman


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala EN passage (1997–2005) 3–7 birds A1
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis VU passage (1997–2005) 7–400 birds A1
Greylag Goose Anser anser LC passage (1997–2006) 1,500–5,000 birds B1i
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons LC winter (1997–2005) 40–8,000 birds B1i
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea LC passage (1997–2005) 600–800 birds A4i, B1i
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo LC passage (1997–2006) 2,500–4,000 birds A4i, B1i
Common Crane Grus grus LC passage (1997–2006) 5,000 birds A4i, B1i
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax NT passage (1997–2006) 20–120 birds A1
Great Bustard Otis tarda EN winter (1997–2005) 20–50 birds A1
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia LC passage (1997–2005) 200–250 birds A4i, B1i
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus NT breeding (1997–2005) 15 pairs A1
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus NT winter (1997–2005) 100–150 birds A1, A4i, B1i
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa NT passage (1997–2005) 70–150 birds A1
Great Snipe Gallinago media NT passage (1997–2005) 50–160 birds A1
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni NT breeding (2006) 18 pairs A1
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni NT passage (1997–2005) 300–400 birds A1
Pallas's Gull Larus ichthyaetus LC passage (1997–2005) 800–1,000 birds A4i, B1i
Common Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica LC passage (1997–2005) 450–500 birds A4i, B1i
Pallid Harrier Circus macrourus NT passage (1997–2005) 25–40 birds A1
A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes n/a passage (1997–2006) 2,500–9,000 birds B1iv

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2006 good low low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat medium

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Grassland good (>90%) good (>90%) good
Wetlands (inland) good (>90%) good (>90%) good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Little/none of area covered (<10%) No management planning has taken place The conservation measures needed for the site are being compre­hensively and effectively implemented low

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Grassland 51 Humid grasslands; Steppes and dry calcareous grassland
Wetlands (inland) 49 Mud flats and sand flats; Standing freshwater

Land use

Land use % of IBA
rangeland/pastureland 50
tourism/recreation 50


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kurnikov liman (Russia (European)). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kurnikov-liman-iba-russia-(european) on 26/12/2024.