AZ046
Kura Delta


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus LC winter (1996–2004) 10–205 birds B1i, B3
Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus LC winter (1996–2004) 19 birds B1i
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina LC winter (1996–2004) 6,000–20,800 birds A4i, B1i
Common Pochard Aythya ferina VU winter (1996–2004) 200–5,800 birds B1i
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT resident (1996–2004) 50–100 birds A1
Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope LC winter (1996–2004) 1,400–3,818 birds B1i
Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus LC resident (1996–2004) 20–122 birds B1i
Black-necked Grebe Podiceps nigricollis LC winter (1996–2004) 10–798 birds B1i
Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides LC breeding (1996) 800–1,000 pairs B1i, B2
Little Egret Egretta garzetta LC breeding (1996–2004) 318–1,000 pairs B1i
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus NT winter (1988–2004) 60–1,118 birds A1, A4i, B1i
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus LC winter (1996–2004) 10–410 birds A4i, B1i, B2
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus LC resident (1996–2004) 884–1,300 pairs A1, A4i, B1i, B2
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo LC breeding (1996–2004) 48 pairs B1i
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa NT winter (1996–2004) 50–1,757 birds B1i, B2
Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis LC winter (1996–2004) 100–240 birds B1i, B2
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a winter (1996) 20,000-49,999 birds A4iii

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2008 poor high very low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Wetlands (inland) moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use likely in short term (<4 years) most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Not assessed No management planning has taken place Some limited conservation initiatives are in place very low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
- NAT AZ022 Game Reserve (-) -

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Wetlands (inland) 100 Sand dunes and beaches; Standing freshwater; Rivers and streams; Water fringe vegetation; Standing brackish and salt water

Land use

Land use % of IBA
fisheries/aquaculture -
hunting -
agriculture -
urban/industrial/transport -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kura Delta (Azerbaijan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kura-delta-iba-azerbaijan on 23/12/2024.