• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis	LC	resident	2005-2006	5-10 breeding pairs	A3
Solitary Snipe Gallinago solitaria	LC	breeding	2005-2006	2-3 breeding pairs	A3
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis	NT	resident	2005-2006	5-8 breeding pairs	A3
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug	EN	resident	2005-2006	5-7 individuals	A1
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus	LC	resident	2005-2006	20-50 breeding pairs	A3
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris	LC	breeding	2005-2006	1-2 breeding pairs	A3
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus	LC	breeding	2005-2006	5-7 breeding pairs	A3
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria	LC	resident	2005-2006	3-4 breeding pairs	A3
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus	LC	resident	2005-2006	10-12 breeding pairs	A3
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens	LC	breeding	2005-2006	10-15 breeding pairs	A3
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta	LC	breeding	2005-2006	5-8 breeding pairs	A3
White-winged Grosbeak Mycerobas carnipes	LC	resident	2005-2006	15-20 breeding pairs	A3
Eurasian Crimson-winged Finch Rhodopechys sanguineus	LC	resident	2005-2006	10-15 breeding pairs	A3

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Biological resource use	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%)	No management planning has taken place	Not assessed	negligible

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Forest		60
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)		25
Grassland		-
Shrubland		-
Wetlands (inland)		-

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use	% of IBA
forestry	100
tourism/recreation	-

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kulikalon Lakes (Tajikistan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kulikalon-lakes-iba-tajikistan on 22/11/2024.