The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | VU | breeding | 1997 | 146 breeding pairs | B3 |
Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena | LC | breeding | 1997 | 93 breeding pairs | B1i, C3 |
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana | LC | breeding | 1997 | 26 breeding pairs | B3, C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | very unfavourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Common Pochard Aythya ferina | 145 | 34 | breeding pairs | 24 | very unfavourable |
Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena | 90 | 38 | breeding pairs | 43 | unfavourable |
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana | 25 | 0 | breeding pairs | 0 | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | TANKAN LUONNONSUOJELUALUE | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 1 |
1993 | KIRKKOLAHDEN LUONNONSUOJELUALUE | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
1995 | Koskeljärvi | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 71 |
1998 | Koskeljärvi | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 72 |
2007 | Koskeljärven luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 23 |
2014 | Vahalan luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Raised bogs | 90 |
Forest | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Koskeljärvi, Vaaljärvi and Pitkäjärvi lakes (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/koskeljärvi-vaaljärvi-and-pitkäjärvi-lakes-iba-finland on 23/11/2024.