The site was identified as important in 2016 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yelkouan Shearwater Puffinus yelkouan | VU | non-breeding | 2016 | 150-200 individuals | A1 |
Eleonora's Falcon Falco eleonorae | LC | breeding | - | 6-8 breeding pairs | A3 |
Masked Shrike Lanius nubicus | LC | breeding | 2016 | rare | A3 |
Olive-tree Warbler Hippolais olivetorum | LC | breeding | 2016 | rare | A3 |
Subalpine Warbler Curruca cantillans | LC | breeding | 2016 | common | A3 |
Sardinian Warbler Curruca melanocephala | LC | resident | 2016 | abundant | A3 |
Rüppell's Warbler Curruca ruppeli | LC | breeding | 2016 | abundant | A3 |
Krueper's Nuthatch Sitta krueperi | LC | resident | 2016 | rare | A3 |
Black-eared Wheatear Oenanthe hispanica | LC | breeding | 2016 | abundant | A3 |
Cretzschmar's Bunting Emberiza caesia | LC | breeding | 2016 | abundant | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2016) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2016. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Intertidal | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Mixed woodland, Native coniferous woodland | major (>10) |
Shrubland | Sclerophyllous scrub, garrigue and maquis | major (>10) |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Neritic | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kizildag Izmir (Türkiye). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kizildag-izmir-iba-türkiye on 22/11/2024.