The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | passage | 1996 | 101-500 individuals | B1i, C2 |
Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus | LC | passage | 1996 | 51-100 individuals | A4i, B1i, C2 |
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia | LC | passage | 1996 | 11-50 individuals | B1i, C2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | very unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | 200 | 100 | individuals | 50 | unfavourable |
Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus | 50 | 11 | individuals | 22 | very unfavourable |
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia | 11 | 2 | individuals | 19 | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1998 | Kirkon-Vilkkiläntura | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 79 |
2004 | Kirkon-Vilkkiläntura Bay | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
2004 | Sumarin luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 1 |
2005 | Kirkon-Vilkkilänturan luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 72 |
2005 | Vilkkilä | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 10 |
2006 | Kolsinpohjan luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 100 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 50 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kirkon-Vilkkiläntura Bay (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kirkon-vilkkiläntura-bay-iba-finland on 23/11/2024.