The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2022 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grey Crowned Crane Balearica regulorum | EN | resident (2018–2022) | 2–30 birds | A1 |
Secretarybird Sagittarius serpentarius | EN | resident (2021) | 6–36 birds | A1 |
Scissor-tailed Kite Chelictinia riocourii | VU | resident (2021) | 10–52 birds | A1 |
Bateleur Terathopius ecaudatus | EN | resident (1999–2022) | 2–32 birds | A1 |
White-headed Vulture Trigonoceps occipitalis | CR | resident (2021–2022) | 12–30 birds | A1 |
Hooded Vulture Necrosyrtes monachus | CR | resident (2021) | 100–200 birds | A1 |
White-backed Vulture Gyps africanus | CR | resident (2021–2022) | 20–100 birds | A1 |
Rüppell's Vulture Gyps rueppelli | CR | resident (2021) | 100–200 birds | A1 |
Martial Eagle Polemaetus bellicosus | EN | resident (2021) | 6–26 birds | A1 |
Tawny Eagle Aquila rapax | VU | resident (2021) | 20–40 birds | A1 |
Steppe Eagle Aquila nipalensis | EN | winter (2021) | 4–32 birds | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2022. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | poor | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | poor |
Grassland | moderate (70–90%) | good (>90%) | moderate |
Wetlands (inland) | good (>90%) | moderate (70–90%) | moderate |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | 66 | Montane forest - mixed |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 22 | Arable land; Farmbush, fallow & ruderal land; Perennial crops, orchards and groves |
Savanna | 11 | Bushland & thicket - evergreen |
Grassland | 1 | Grassland - Semi-desert |
Wetlands (inland) | minor (<10) | Freshwater lakes and pools; Artificial wetlands |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kirisia Forest (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kirisia-forest-iba-kenya on 23/12/2024.