The site was identified as important in 2022 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grey Crowned Crane Balearica regulorum | EN | resident | 2018-2022 | 2-30 individuals | A1 |
Secretarybird Sagittarius serpentarius | EN | resident | 2021 | 6-36 individuals | A1 |
Scissor-tailed Kite Chelictinia riocourii | VU | resident | 2021 | 10-52 individuals | A1 |
Bateleur Terathopius ecaudatus | EN | resident | 1999-2022 | 2-32 individuals | A1 |
White-headed Vulture Trigonoceps occipitalis | CR | resident | 2021-2022 | 12-30 individuals | A1 |
Hooded Vulture Necrosyrtes monachus | CR | resident | 2021 | 100-200 individuals | A1 |
White-backed Vulture Gyps africanus | CR | resident | 2021-2022 | 20-100 individuals | A1 |
Rüppell's Vulture Gyps rueppelli | CR | resident | 2021 | 100-200 individuals | A1 |
Martial Eagle Polemaetus bellicosus | EN | resident | 2021 | 6-26 individuals | A1 |
Tawny Eagle Aquila rapax | VU | resident | 2021 | 20-40 individuals | A1 |
Steppe Eagle Aquila nipalensis | EN | winter | 2021 | 4-32 individuals | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2022) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2022. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | unfavourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Montane forest - mixed | 66 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Farmbush, fallow & ruderal land, Perennial crops, orchards and groves | 22 |
Savanna | Bushland & thicket - evergreen | 11 |
Grassland | Grassland - Semi-desert | 1 |
Wetlands (inland) | Freshwater lakes and pools, Artificial wetlands | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kirisia Forest (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kirisia-forest-iba-kenya on 22/11/2024.