Kirisia Forest


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2022 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Grey Crowned Crane Balearica regulorum EN resident 2018-2022 2-30 individuals A1
Secretarybird Sagittarius serpentarius EN resident 2021 6-36 individuals A1
Scissor-tailed Kite Chelictinia riocourii VU resident 2021 10-52 individuals A1
Bateleur Terathopius ecaudatus EN resident 1999-2022 2-32 individuals A1
White-headed Vulture Trigonoceps occipitalis CR resident 2021-2022 12-30 individuals A1
Hooded Vulture Necrosyrtes monachus CR resident 2021 100-200 individuals A1
White-backed Vulture Gyps africanus CR resident 2021-2022 20-100 individuals A1
Rüppell's Vulture Gyps rueppelli CR resident 2021 100-200 individuals A1
Martial Eagle Polemaetus bellicosus EN resident 2021 6-26 individuals A1
Tawny Eagle Aquila rapax VU resident 2021 20-40 individuals A1
Steppe Eagle Aquila nipalensis EN winter 2021 4-32 individuals A1

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2022) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2022. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2023 unfavourable high high
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Forest moderate (70-90%) moderate (70-90%) unfavourable
Grassland moderate (70-90%) good (> 90%) near favourable
Wetlands (inland) good (> 90%) moderate (70-90%) near favourable
Artificial/Terrestrial good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use happening now some of area/population (10-49%) very rapid to severe deterioration high
Natural system modifications likely in short term (within 4 years) whole area/population (>90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Pollution happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Climate change and severe weather happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Residential and commercial development happening now whole area/population (>90%) slow but significant deterioration high
Transportation and service corridors happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Agricultural expansion and intensification past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting whole area/population (>90%) moderate to rapid deterioration low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity high

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Forest Montane forest - mixed 66
Artificial/Terrestrial Arable land, Farmbush, fallow & ruderal land, Perennial crops, orchards and groves 22
Savanna Bushland & thicket - evergreen 11
Grassland Grassland - Semi-desert 1
Wetlands (inland) Freshwater lakes and pools, Artificial wetlands minor (<10)
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
forestry 100

Land ownership
 The gazetted area is managed by both Kenya Forest Service (KFS) and Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) while the buffer zone is within private ownership.



Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kirisia Forest (Kenya). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kirisia-forest-iba-kenya on 22/11/2024.