Data Zone
The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident (1981–2006) | 1–3 pairs | A3 |
| Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | EN | resident (1981–1997) | 1–3 pairs | A1 |
| Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | breeding (2006) | 1 | A3 |
| Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident (1981–2006) | 2–9 pairs | A3 |
| Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | breeding (2006) | 1 | A3 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2006 | good | low | very low |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| yes | habitat | poor | |
| State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
| Grassland | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
| Wetlands (inland) | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
| Biological resource use | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
| Some of area covered (10–49%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | very low |
| Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | Ozero Kezenoj-Am (Ejzenam) | Nature Monument (III) | 17 |
| Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Grassland | 52 | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland |
| Wetlands (inland) | 40 | Standing freshwater |
| Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 8 | Scree & boulders |
| Land use | % of IBA |
|---|---|
| rangeland/pastureland | 52 |
| not utilised | 47 |
| agriculture | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kezenoi-Am lake (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kezenoi-am-lake-iba-russia-(european) on 23/12/2024.