Data Zone
The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caucasian Snowcock Tetraogallus caucasicus | LC | resident (2005–2007) | 50–70 pairs | A2, A3 |
| Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident (2005–2007) | 30–50 pairs | A1, A2, A3 |
| Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus | NT | resident (2005–2007) | 2–4 pairs | B2 |
| Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | breeding (2005–2007) | 1 | A3 |
| White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus | LC | breeding (2005–2007) | 1 | A3 |
| Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | resident (-) | present | A3 |
| Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla | LC | breeding (2005–2007) | 1 | A3 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2007 | good | medium | very low |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| yes | habitat | medium | |
| State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
| Shrubland | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
| Grassland | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
| Little/none of area covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | very low |
| Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Grassland | 60 | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland |
| Forest | 15 | Broadleaved deciduous woodland; Native coniferous woodland; Mixed woodland |
| Shrubland | 15 | |
| Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 10 | Scree & boulders |
| Other | 5 | |
| Wetlands (inland) | 1 | Rivers and streams |
| Land use | % of IBA |
|---|---|
| hunting | 90 |
| rangeland/pastureland | 50 |
| forestry | 10 |
| agriculture | 1 |
| urban/industrial/transport | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kebyaktepe ridge (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kebyaktepe-ridge-iba-russia-(european) on 23/12/2024.