The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian Snowcock Tetraogallus caucasicus | LC | resident | 2005-2007 | 50-70 breeding pairs | A2, A3 |
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident | 2005-2007 | 30-50 breeding pairs | A1, A2, A3 |
Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus | NT | resident | 2005-2007 | 2-4 breeding pairs | B2 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | breeding | 2005-2007 | 1 | A3 |
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus | LC | breeding | 2005-2007 | 1 | A3 |
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla | LC | breeding | 2005-2007 | 1 | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | favourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland | 60 |
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland, Mixed woodland | 15 |
Shrubland | 15 | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree & boulders | 10 |
Other | 5 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 90 |
rangeland/pastureland | 50 |
forestry | 10 |
agriculture | 1 |
urban/industrial/transport | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kebyaktepe ridge (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kebyaktepe-ridge-iba-russia-(european) on 22/11/2024.