The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Solitary Snipe Gallinago solitaria | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 2–4 pairs | A3 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 50–60 pairs | A1 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | breeding (2000–2006) | 1–2 pairs | A1 |
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 20–30 pairs | A3 |
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 7–8 pairs | A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 5–6 pairs | A3 |
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 8–10 pairs | A3 |
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 10–15 pairs | A3 |
White-winged Grosbeak Mycerobas carnipes | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 5–10 pairs | A3 |
Red-mantled Rosefinch Carpodacus rhodochlamys | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 15–20 pairs | A3 |
Eurasian Crimson-winged Finch Rhodopechys sanguineus | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 20–30 pairs | A3 |
Red-fronted Serin Serinus pusillus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 10–15 pairs | A3 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 15 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 10 | |
Desert | - | |
Introduced vegetation | - | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - | |
Shrubland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
water management | 20 |
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kattasay and Daganasay Reservoirs (Tajikistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kattasay-and-daganasay-reservoirs-iba-tajikistan on 23/12/2024.