UZ012
Karakyr Lakes


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala EN winter 2004-2006 30-5,000 adults A1, A4i
Greylag Goose Anser anser LC winter 2000-2005 115-27,695 adults A4i
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus VU winter 2005 30 adults A1
Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula LC winter 2000-2004 1-790 adults A4i
Smew Mergellus albellus LC winter 2000-2005 2-491 adults A4i
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina LC winter 2000-2005 1,102-41,700 adults A4i
Common Pochard Aythya ferina VU winter 2000-2005 184-34,050 adults A4i
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT winter 2004 50 adults A1
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos LC winter 2000-2005 917-12,332 adults A4i
Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena LC winter 2004-2005 1-300 adults A4i
Egyptian Nightjar Caprimulgus aegyptius LC breeding 1998-2006 2-14 individuals A3
Eurasian Coot Fulica atra LC winter 2000-2005 5,206-46,000 adults A4i
Asian Houbara Chlamydotis macqueenii VU breeding 1998-2000 2-14 individuals A3
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus NT winter 2004 44 adults A1
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus LC winter 2000-2005 23-5,560 adults A4i
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo LC winter 2000-2005 3-2,040 adults A4i
Turkestan Ground-jay Podoces panderi LC resident 1998-2006 1 individuals A3
Sykes's Warbler Iduna rama LC breeding 1998-2006 3-20 individuals A3
Streaked Scrub-warbler Scotocerca inquieta LC breeding 1998-2006 1-5 individuals A3
Desert Finch Rhodospiza obsoleta LC resident 1998-2006 2-6 individuals A3
Red-headed Bunting Emberiza bruniceps LC breeding 1998-2006 1-7 individuals A3
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a winter 2000-2004 85,070-144,173 individuals A4iii

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2006 not assessed very high negligible
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes unset good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Biological resource use happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%) No management planning has taken place Some limited conservation initiatives are in place negligible

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
1992 Karakir Wildlife Refuge 31

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Wetlands (inland) 79
Desert 10
Artificial/Terrestrial 5
Forest 3
Shrubland 3
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
fisheries/aquaculture 40
agriculture 30
hunting 20
nature conservation and research 10
forestry 5


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Karakyr Lakes (Uzbekistan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/karakyr-lakes-iba-uzbekistan on 22/11/2024.