The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina | LC | winter | 2007 | 600-1,000 individuals | B1i |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | breeding | 2007 | 15-30 breeding pairs | A1 |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | passage | 2007 | 200 individuals | A1 |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | breeding | 2003-2007 | 42-60 individuals | A1, A4i, B1i, B2 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2007 | 10-15 breeding pairs | A1 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | non-breeding | 2007 | 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | favourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1985 | Tarumovskiy | Zakaznik | 85 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Water fringe vegetation | 90 |
Desert | Semidesert | 5 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Urban parks and gardens | 4 |
Forest | 1 | |
Grassland | Humid grasslands | 1 |
Shrubland | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 80 |
nature conservation and research | 80 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 50 |
water management | 50 |
rangeland/pastureland | 20 |
agriculture | 1 |
urban/industrial/transport | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Karakol'skiye lakes (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/karakolskiye-lakes-iba-russia-(european) on 23/11/2024.