The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | winter | 1997 | 60-100 individuals | A1 |
Eurasian Coot Fulica atra | LC | winter | 1997 | 40,000-50,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Armenian Gull Larus armenicus | LC | resident | - | 580-810 individuals | A4i, B1i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | - | 47,000-80,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | favourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Karakaya Baraji UOSA | Wetland of National Importance | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 72 | |
Other | 28 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Karakaya Reservoir (Türkiye). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/karakaya-reservoir-iba-türkiye on 23/11/2024.