The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Gadwall Mareca strepera | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Northern Pintail Anas acuta | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Common Teal Anas crecca | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | unknown | 2004 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2002 | Kanjli | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kanjli Lake (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kanjli-lake-iba-india on 22/11/2024.