KZ026
Kamyshovoe-Zhamankol Lakes


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus LC passage 1997 558 individuals A4i
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis VU passage 1999 32-6,200 individuals A1, A4i
Greylag Goose Anser anser LC passage 1997-2000 1,310-28,200 individuals A4i
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons LC passage 1997-2000 2,500-49,994 individuals A4i
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus VU passage 1997-1999 50-506 individuals A1, A4i
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo LC breeding 2006 present A3
Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo LC passage 1997 3,000 individuals A4i
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa NT breeding 2004 30-80 breeding pairs A1
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni NT breeding 2004 200-300 breeding pairs A1, A3
Pallid Harrier Circus macrourus NT breeding 2000 10 breeding pairs A3
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus VU breeding 2006-2007 < 50 breeding pairs A1, A3
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a passage 1997-2006 50,000-99,999 individuals A4iii

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2015 very unfavourable medium not assessed
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Reference Actual Units % remaining Result
Greylag Goose Anser anser 338 130 individuals 39 very unfavourable
Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula 187 5 individuals 3 very unfavourable
Common Pochard Aythya ferina 106 1 individuals 1 very unfavourable
Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula 102 6 individuals 6 very unfavourable
Greater Scaup Aythya marila 17 17 individuals 100 favourable
Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope 61 2 individuals 4 very unfavourable
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 224 45 individuals 21 very unfavourable
Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena 35 1 individuals 3 very unfavourable
Eurasian Coot Fulica atra 1,120 7 individuals 1 very unfavourable
Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus 60 60 individuals 100 favourable
Mew Gull Larus canus 29 29 individuals 100 favourable
Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus 1 1 individuals 100 favourable
Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus 1 1 individuals 100 favourable
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla 1 1 individuals 100 favourable
Rough-legged Buzzard Buteo lagopus 1 1 individuals 100 favourable
Mistle Thrush Turdus viscivorus 18 18 individuals 100 favourable
A4iii Species group - waterbirds 9,671 359 individuals 4 very unfavourable

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Grassland poor (40-69%) moderate (70-90%) very unfavourable
Shrubland moderate (70-90%) good (> 90%) near favourable
Artificial/Terrestrial good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable
Wetlands (inland) good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Natural system modifications happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Not assessed Not assessed Not assessed not assessed

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Wetlands (inland) Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation 52
Grassland Mesophile grassland & tall grass steppe, Steppes & dry calcareous 32
Artificial/Terrestrial Arable land, Highly improved reseeded grasslands 16
Shrubland Low bushes minor (<10)
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
hunting 50
fisheries/aquaculture 40
rangeland/pastureland 30
agriculture 16


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kamyshovoe-Zhamankol Lakes (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kamyshovoe-zhamankol-lakes-iba-kazakhstan on 23/11/2024.