The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | winter | 2003 | 27,120 individuals | A4i |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | winter | 2003 | 500 individuals | A4i |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus | LC | winter | 2003 | 300 individuals | A4i |
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa | NT | winter | 2003 | 7,000 individuals | A4i |
Ruff Calidris pugnax | LC | winter | 2003 | 1,000 individuals | A4i |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | 2003 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
rangeland/pastureland | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kaj Lake (Pipalava Bandharo) (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kaj-lake-(pipalava-bandharo)-iba-india on 23/11/2024.