The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | near favourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Kaapsehoop | National Heritage Site | 100 |
2013 | Blouswaelvlakte Reserve | Forest Nature Reserve | 25 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Montane forest - mixed | 96 |
Grassland | Grassland - highveld | 25 |
Shrubland | 2 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Montane bogs, swamps and mires | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 65 |
forestry | 25 |
water management | 20 |
other | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kaapsehoop (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kaapsehoop-iba-south-africa on 22/11/2024.